"The Eight Net Gen Norms"
Chapter
3 from Donald Tapscott’s (2009) Grown up Digital discusses the eight
norms that characterize the Net Generation. As a member of the Net Generation,
I found this chapter interesting as I related to many of the outlined characteristics.
The norms discussed were:
Freedom
Customization
Scrutiny
Integrity
Collaboration
Entertainment
Speed
Innovation
PROS:
I appreciated
most of the norms as they were relatable to me as a member of the Net Gen
demographic. Norms like collaboration and speed were familiar to my personal experiences
as well as my experiences teaching Net Gen learners. Collaboration emphasizes
that “Net Geners are natural collaborators” (Tapscott, 2009, p. 89). The
formulation of Wikipedia is used as an inspiring example of how the use of technology has
enhanced worldwide collaboration and ultimately, functioned to transform modern
society. The proof is in the development of a number of collaborative tools
like Web 2.0, Knowledge Forums, and Blogging sites. Tapscott (2009) recognizes
the reciprocal impact of the individual (using their collaborative skills) on
the environment (by creating a worldwide Wiki) as well as the environments
influence on the individual Net Geners. In other words, “new collaboration […]
would have been impossible to achieve without a new generation of collaboration
tools” (Tapscott, 2009, p. 91). Tapscott
(2009) takes a holistic view at the impact of these norms on professional, personal,
and social practices, which makes this paper hard to refute.
CHALLENGES:
Where
I found myself disagreeing was regarding the norm titled, “Scrutiny”, which
suggests that “today’s youth have the ability to distinguish between fact and
fiction” (Tapscott, 2009). With Critical Media Literacy being one of my
passions, I have read a lot of research that suggests otherwise; Net Geners are
actually influenced tremendously by what they see and hear and must be taught
the skills to think critically or scrutinize their surroundings. Tapscott (2009) suggests, “The Net Generation
knows to be skeptical whenever they’re online”. Kellner and Share (2005), on
the other hand, stress that “Computer and multimedia technologies demand novel
skills and competencies” and therefore, require “new curricula and pedagogies” (p.
370-371). From the research I have read, Net Geners require the ability to
distinguish between fact and fiction but have not effectively acquired those
skills. From my personal experiences, I did not acquire critical media literacy
skills until my Undergraduate degree.
Tapscott
(2009) uses the “Evolution” Dove campaign as an example of the scrutiny of Net
Geners. However, he notes that the video was “a big hit” (p. 80) but I
wonder if this was due to Net Geners disbelief when they saw that video. I was personally shocked and could
not believe that pictures and videos were edited to that extreme. In other
words, as a Net Gener I was not critical enough of the media that surrounded me. I pride
myself in being a critical thinker and yet, I am first to recognize that I had
to develop these skills. Kellner and Share (2005) recognize that our North
American education does not support the efficient development of critical media
literacy skills despite Tapscott's (2009) recognition of their scrutiny.
QUESTIONS:
QUESTIONS:
- How will these norms affect the future and the norms of the next generation?
- Are these norms too generalized to include an entire generation?
- What about those that do not conform to these norms, where do they fit in?
- Is the Net Generation a worldwide phenomenon? Or are they mainly North American?
*In the following
video, Tapscott addresses the division of the generation (top 1/3 vs. bottom
1/3):
Tapscott,
D. (2009). “Characteristics of a Generation: The Eight Net Gen Norms”. In Growing up digital. (pp. 73-96). New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from
Amanda,
ReplyDeleteI also wondered if his ideas of the net gen were worldwide or not, I would feel like as long as it is in within the developed world, that it may include the world as Tapscott mentioned that when we search for objects to buy that if we search for electronics to buy the options are around 900000, but if we were in Asia that number increases (Tapscott, 2009, p 77). Although that doesn't really make this collection of research worldwide applicable, but at the beginning of the chapter we were to read, in the preface, it said that they interviewed students from US and Canada at first, and then from 12 different countries through randomly selected internet users (Tapscott, 2009, p. 72). So the information was compiled by those users who had internet access which then depending on your definition of worldwide, it would be but only by those who have internet access.
I also agreed and saw a lot of the same norms within my own growing up and still do expect a lot of the same. I still see a lot of scrutiny problems within the children that I teach despite them being even more immersed in technology. They seem to have scrutiny issues as well in the search for information that is truthful and backed up by research or a good reputation. Even knowing the nature of wikipedia and that it is comprised of any individuals creating the page, many students use this as their main source of research, while not even bothering to look at sites that are based on professional advice or research, however this is just based on my personal experience and may not be seen as a norm.
Amanda, I am glad that you brought up the point, “he notes that the video was a “big hit” (p.80) but I wonder if this was due to Net Geners disbelief when they saw that video.” These types of questions went through my mind many times, like how can you prove that was the only reason for that. I felt as though there were many statements made in the chapter that just made me think of a few other reasons for that particular occurrence. I may agree with it and another individual may but that doesn’t mean that is the perspective on that particular issue by everyone.
ReplyDeleteAs for it being worldwide, I agree with what Rebekah mentioned and how only individuals that had internet access were surveyed, it doesn’t give us a very accurate worldwide view of things.